|
September 2004 archives
The following are all the entries published for the month of September 2004. illegal immigrants offended by dui checkpoints
Monday 27 September, 2004 at 6:04PM (Nereus) :: permalink :: comments (2) This is just nuts. As published in the Oakland Tribune, immigrant activists say police DUI checkpoints discriminate against those without licenses, particularly illegal aliens. What amazes me is that the Oakland police have actually stopped setting up roadblocks to check whether drivers are under the influence of alcohol, purely because of these 'complaints'. The checkpoints allow officers to check licenses and proof of insurance, and are an effective way to get drunken drivers off the roads, but the checkpoints also have caught dozens of illegal aliens who are obviously not licensed to drive, yet otherwise obey the law. My first thought was, 'Great, they're killing two birds with one stone, so what's the problem? They're not obeying the law - they're illegal aliens, and what's more, they are driving without a license or insurance for fark sake!'. I mean hello, does the word illegal not point something out that should be painfully obvious? Or perhaps they should be referred to as 'undocumented immigrants' instead, and therefore they're not breaking any laws.. "These checkpoints make people's lives miserable, not make them safer," said Jesus Rodriguez of Oakland Community Organizations, which filed most of the complaints about the checkpoints. Is this guy insane? Let's see how he feels about it when his family is wiped out by a drunk driver who would otherwise not have been on the roads. The police apparently have stopped all checkpoints until they write up some new guidelines, so hey, if you live in Oakland and are drinking, I guess the message is to feel free to take a drive while you're at it because nobody is going to stop you, particularly if you're an illegal immigrant. The new checkpoint guidelines, which are not final, may call for police to notify Latino community organizations of the time and location of coming checkpoints. Unbelievable. Now that is discrimination. Guess it pays to break the law huh. While officers have some discretion, the cars of unlicensed drivers are usually towed. To get their cars back, owners must pay $125, plus any storage fees. That is a significant burden to many illegal immigrants, Rodriguez said. What the fark?? They should be put on a plane and sent back to whatever country they came from - they're illegal immigrants, does nobody understand that? What's more is they're also breaking laws by driving without a license and without insurance. Grow some friggin balls police Chief Richard Word, and tell this guy Rodriguez to go fuck himself. If a legal citizen drives without a license or insurance, they have to pay fines and have their vehicle impounded, so why the hell should a friggin felon be exempt? This is the most stupid thing I've heard so far this week (but heck, it's only Monday). stressing
Sunday 26 September, 2004 at 1:00PM (Nereus) :: permalink :: comments (3) It's been a whole 12 days since I last had a cigarette. That's the longest I've gone without one for many years. I last had one on Tuesday September 14th (and I only had one smoke that entire day), which was the day I was sent to hospital. I've had some really strong cravings for a smoke but have managed to resist so far. There is a full packet of smokes sitting here which I have not touched, I figure if I threw them out, part of me would think the only reason I haven't smoked is because I didn't have any cigarettes. I figure if I can resist the temptation then it's because of my own will, not just because I didn't have a choice. Seems to work for me anyway - make it as hard as possible so I know I've done it by sheer will power rather than just deprivation. We have nicotine patches and gum, but I've managed to go without their assistance so far as well, although I might need them tomorrow. I will return to university tomorrow and hope like hell I'm not kicked out of any of my courses for being absent (regardless of the fact I was actually in hospital). I dread how much catching up I will need to do, particularly with calculus. I was lost in there as it was, and have serious doubts about being able to pass it while still maintaining high marks in the other four subjects I'm doing even if I had not been absent. I've missed 4 College Trig classes, 6 Calculus classes, 6 English classes, 4 Health & Phys Ed classes, and 4 Psychology classes (would've been more but there was some Jewish holiday in there somewhere so the college was closed). I know they take marks off your final grade based on absenteeism (and can boot you out of the class if you've missed enough), but I friggin hope that is not the case if I was in hospital and can get medical certificates to prove it. I tried calling the Dean last week (after talking to a bunch of others first who kept transferring me). The Dean said I will need to talk to each of my class Professors about it. Since my voice was pretty much gone by the time I finished talking at that point, I am going to attempt to talk to each professor tomorrow, although how I'm going to do that when I have non-stop classes all day tomorrow with only 10 minutes between each one to run to the next one, I don't know. I also need to go back to the hospital on Tuesday so they can see if I've recovered sufficiently, and I need to go to my own doctor to get my second (and final) measles shot. I then have to take proof of that shot back to university as it seems they've lost all the records of immunization I gave them when I enrolled. I also need to go to the bursars office apparently about my FAFSA grant. I'm going to be an extremely busy little weasel for the next couple of weeks, that's for sure. I haven't heard yet if my stint in hospital will be covered by medicaid yet since I'm a fulltime student without medical insurance. I really hope so, as I just got the bill for a blood test I needed to be able to enroll at college here.. the doctors charged me like $50 for the visit and the blood test, and told me the labs woud also send me a bill which would probably be about $50 as well. It wasn't. It was $308.75! That's for one single blood test! In hospital I had cat-scans, chest x-rays, multiple blood tests, three lumbar punctures (spinal taps), and was on an IV drip for two days straight with a bag of fluids and another bag of antibiotics being pumped into me. I am still taking antibiotics now (actually just finished the course this morning). All that will easily be into the tens of thousands of dollars in cost, easily. I've had to censor the bulk of the rest of this entry for legal reasons. It was covering the Inland Revenue Child Support Dept of New Zealand and their unjust practices. I will be writing to the Minister of Social Welfare in NZ first, and failing any action there, I will go public with it. Until then it is best I say nothing ..other than they're a pack of complete and utter bastards imho. The only other thing I will say at this point is that they are charging me child support since leaving NZ of an amount that is three times higher than my total pre-tax income over the same period of time, and they see nothing wrong with that. It's a lot more involved, believe me, and more recently they actually admit to giving me the wrong info three years ago which led to much of this mess, but then tell me I should have known better than to believe what they told me back then, and that I should know more about their department than they do (because they gave me incorrect information originally which I should have somehow known was incorrect), which they then somehow figure is justification for ripping me off! Unbelievable. Add to this the matter of trying to get our landlord to fix anything here. They have half completed the work they said they'd do months ago, but only after missing 12 separate appointments where I had to sit here all day each time waiting for them not to turn up. I have already had legal advice on this and now have to write a letter to them detailing all the problems, and then tell them we are hiring an independent contractor to do the work and will take the cost out of our rent. Because Ice is working full time and I am studying full time now, they will have to come in the weekends to do the work, which will cost a lot more. I'm still wondering if we should also charge them for the 12 separate days wasted waiting for them to turn up. Bastards. There's very little in my life that doesn't suck at the moment - IceQueen is the one good thing I have going for me. Thanks babe. Most of this I've written down to get my own thoughts in order before I start writing letters to the media, but first I have a couple of weeks of university to catch up on.. sheesh. I can't help thinking sometimes it would've been better if I had not made it out of hospital. Damn, I really want a smoke now. calling a spade a spade
Wednesday 22 September, 2004 at 5:22PM (Nereus) :: permalink :: comments (6) Back to the old politically correct bollox again ..at least I guess it's political correctness since I can't see any other possible reason as to why much of the media presents stories while doing anything they can to avoid using words such as terrorist lately. An example is given on Michelle Malkin's website where she looks at how a front-page New York Times article describes the perpetrators of the siege in Beslan a few weeks back: The killers are called "guerrillas" and "fighters" and "armed captors", but never "terrorists." At one point the article grudgingly refers to these savage murderers as "people that Mr. Putin calls terrorists." In more than 1,750 words, the article includes not one reference to the religion of the Muslim perpetrators. Not one. Another example is news editors changing labels such as illegal aliens into undocumented immigrants, as if that somehow wipes away their illegal status. There's many more examples out there, just pick up a newspaper and start reading. Canadian media organisation CanWest apparently got sick of the endless Reuters dispatches sanitizing Islamofascist killers by calling them more sympathetic names such as militants, activists, gunmen etc, instead of the more accurate and honest title terrorists, and so CanWest decided to replace all these alternate words back to what they actually refer to - terrorists. A weblogger by the name of (I think) Maarten who runs a weblog titled 'Live from Brussels' had been reading about this and decided to take it a step further. If you're a MovableType content management system user, Maarten whipped up a quick Movable Type plugin, the CanWest filter. Just unzip and drop it into your MT plugins folder, and when publishing an MT entry select the 'CanWest' filter as text formatting. It will change all instances of the words militant, activist, fighter, gunman and resistance into the T-word. At Michelle's suggestion, he has also written one that automatically superscripts the 'th' in any occurance of the name 'Dan Rather', and automatically adds sarcastic little quotemarks around the word news in any instance of the phrase CBS 'News'. Nice work. tsa - tragically stupid or just anal?
Monday 20 September, 2004 at 9:18PM (Nereus) :: permalink :: comments (5) :: trackbacks (1) Well it's hard to say after the latest little escapades by TSA staff. As reported in the NY Daily News, the NYPD bomb squad was called to LaGuardia Airport early on Saturday after four M-80 explosives (which are apparently little more than fireworks basically) were found stuffed into a tissue box in a bathroom at the rear of the aircraft by a Spirit Airlines mechanic shortly after Flight 710 arrived from Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Well, it looks like the TSA people in Florida have been a bit lax.. or have they? Reported on Local6 a few days earlier was the story of a clearly dangerous woman detained by screeners in Tampa, Florida. Yes, this imposing 52-year-old special education teacher was arrested for being in possession of ...wait for it ...a bookmark! Omigod! What was she thinking? The bookmark was an 8½inch leather strip with small lead weights at each end. Airport police said it resembled a weighted weapon that could be used to knock people unconscious, so rather than apply any common sense and question her about it, the teacher was immediately handcuffed, put into a police car, and charged with carrying a concealed weapon, which meant a possible criminal trial and a $10,000 fine. Idiots, my fists can be used to knock people unconscious, should I leave them at home in future? The state authorities have since declined to prosecute, and the TSA said "it probably won't impose a fine". Probably wouldn't? What the hell is wrong with these people? Are they all complete raving lunatics? What they probably should be doing is apologizing profusely to the latest victim of their neo-nazi self-serving troops who harass commuters every day, taking items for their own personal use such as pain killers, jewelry, lighters, bookmarks, but obviously not M-80 explosives (since these had to be taken through TSA screeners before being hidden on the airplane). Why is it so hard for the TSA to admit they messed up, again? Now one thing interests me. If an 8½inch leather strip with small lead weights at each end intended for use as a bookmark is considered a weapon, then what the hell do you call a 40inch leather strip with a large weighted metal object at one end? It must be really bad, right? Oh, hang on, that sounds like a belt... damn. Ok, how about a person wielding not one but two 8½inch leather reinforced objects, with a 3inch spike at the end of each! Now that's gotta be worth a few years in prison and a $25,000 fine at least, right? Oh, wait a moment, those sound just like a pair of womens shoes don't they? DOH! Damn, looks like the good old TSA is going to have to arrest everyone wearing clothes, and then they can arrest the naked ones as well for public lewdness! Heck why even fuel up the planes - who needs 'em? Everyone should be arrested anyway! And don't worry about loss of income, at $10,000 a pop, this will be a whole lot more profitable than running an airline service! Woot! Pack of friggin morons. GET A CLUE! Thanks to John P Hoke's Asylum for bringing this to my attention. hospitalized
Saturday 18 September, 2004 at 4:54PM (Nereus) :: permalink :: comments (9) I have not been a well Weasel. In my last entry I wrote that I was off to see my doctor which is exactly what I did. My doctor diagnosed me as having severe pneumonia (the other possibility was meningitis), and told me I had a temperature of 103 and needed to get to hospital immediately. He was going to call an ambulance for me from there, but since I don't have medical insurance I walked home from the doctor instead (just around the corner a bit) and then IceQueen called car service and we went to the hospital that way. After I supplied a urine sample we waited for hours in the hospital 'workup' rooms, but then I started losing consciousness and I was rushed to the intensive care unit (or acute care, whatever). They took blood samples had hooked me into a couple of IV drips of saline and antibiotics and stuck monitors all over me with EKG machines etc, the whole nine yards. IceQueen's Dad turned up too and they were both obviously freaking when I went unconscious and went into ICU - I vaguely remember some bolshy nurse threatening to call security on them if they didn't stay out of the ICU, I'm so glad Ice was there though. I lost consciousness again in ICU and apparently my blood pressure (which is normally slightly above normal) dropped dangerously low and the doctors decided to then run me through a bunch of tests to try and figure out what was really wrong, so off I went for a cat-scan and chest x-ray to see what was causing the headaches etc. A little while later in ICU the doctors came back and said the cat-scan was clear (whew) and the chest x-ray showed I didn't have pneumonia, so now it was a matter of eliminating possibilities. The blood and urine tests didn't give any definitive answers so they were going to have to do a lumbar puncture, also known as a friggin spinal tap. To make matters worse, since I'd reacted to anesthetics when at the dentist a year or so ago, the doctor was going to have to do the spinal tap without any anesthetic. Lovely. Spinal taps are not fun. I had three of them before they had enough of my spinal fluid to analyze to see if I had meningitis or some other infection in the fluid around the brain. I didn't scream at all, I think I just said 'fuck' pretty loudly on the 3rd one but that was about it, heh. My lower back is still sore now, four days later - the doctor advised the sore back and accompanying headache will last for about a week as a result of the spinal tap, which makes it kinda tough to know if my headache now is a result of that or because of something else. Anyway the tests from that came out clear, so no meningitis (good). I spent the next couple of days in hospital on IV drip and my blood pressure leveled out at a nice 110/70 and my fever dropped with the IV drips etc, and finally they let me return home on Thursday late afternoon. Unfortunately after all that, they don't know what the hell I have, it seems to be some mystery viral thing that is particularly nasty, and also I guess weakens me so they have me on strong antibiotics for another couple of weeks and then I have to go back to hospital for a follow-up in about 10 days. Of course if the fever returns they said I'll need to be re-admitted immediately. The headache has not stopped yet, and I feel very light-headed most of the time too and not in a very good mood at all, as IceQueen found out when I got all shitty last night when she wanted me to get back to bed but I wanted to fix the PC. I guess stopping smoking again at the same time has also made me extra shitty and not the best of company (had half a cigarette last Tuesday, nothing since). IceQueen has taken time off work and looked after me and visited when I was in hospital and got everything organized re forms etc (hopefully everything will be covered by Medicare) and has just been awesome, so I feel like a prick for getting so shitty last night. Sorry sweetness. Her parents have been really supportive too, coming to hospital and her Mum made cutlets for when I got home again which were awesome. Anyway I'm not feeling great so I'm signing off for now. update.. my doctor said it looks like I had West Nile Virus - a particularly nasty virus that has killed a bunch of people here in NYC as well as elsewhere. Probably got it from a mosquito bite. Apparently it has around a 15% fatality rate. Eep. monster headache
Tuesday 14 September, 2004 at 3:16PM (Nereus) :: permalink :: comments (2) I've still got a monster headache I've had since Thursday night. Along with the feeling that an elephant's been stomping on my head constantly for nearly four days, I've been suffering fevers where I'm absolutely drenched with sweat (seriously, it looks like I stepped into the shower with my clothes on), then half an hour later I'm shivering cold with chattering teeth. I managed to make it through all five classes yesterday but was close to blacking out in two of them, so I'm going to the doctor later today. IceQueen was worried it might be viral meningitis since I have all the symptoms other than throwing up, and it got bad enough last night that she rang 911 and they sent some EMS people around. They checked me out a bit, but didn't even bother taking my temperature, and kept asking if I take drugs and seemed to be inferring I was in withdrawal or something - they seemed very pessimistic that I was actually really sick. They said they'd take me to hospital if I really wanted, but said the wait time was like 6 hours or more in the emergency rooms and nowhere to lay down and suggested I go see a doctor the next day if I'm not better. Since I already had set an appointment with my doctor for later this afternoon, I stayed put. Our printer died in the weekend so IceQueen got a new one which is all up and running, thanks sweetness. Ice has been looking after me and made soup which is great - that's pretty much all I've been able to eat for a few days. Oh, and I won a tshirt from surf.co.nz for a story I wrote ages ago, thanks guys! Oh yeah, Urban Scrawl received its 100,000th visitor about half an hour ago! conspiracy theory
Monday 13 September, 2004 at 12:03AM (Nereus) :: permalink :: comments (6) This is very interesting. The Pentagon: What really happened? Check out this conspiracy theory in flash format from freedomunderground.org, questioning if American Airlines Flight 77 really did impact The Pentagon on 911. It's actually a load of crap, in my opinion. They have quotes of a couple of people saying, "it sounded like a missile!" - how do these people know what a missile sounds like? There are hundreds of eye witnesses completely ignored by this farce, and instead the producers only highlight the people who didn't actually see it, but allegedly heard it and saw the result, and since they didn't see a plane sticking out of the Pentagon like some kid's drawing, they assume there was no plane. Real winners. Here's some proof for you - youtube video of what happens when a plane crashes into a reinforced concrete wall. The entire plane is utterly pulverized into dust, there is nothing left bigger than a few inches, let alone anything that looks even remotely like part of a plane. Solved. asteroid 2004 ru109
Sunday 12 September, 2004 at 11:49AM (Nereus) :: permalink :: comments (0) Another asteroid is due to make a close call past earth tomorrow. I wrote an entry about a month ago regarding some of the close calls we've had recently, as well as upcoming ones such as the massive '4179 Toutatis' due to pass at the end of September. It seems a smaller one (2004 RU109) has been recently discovered and is due to pass earth at about the same distance as the moon is from earth (this is regarded as a very close approach). Fortunately this one is comparitively small, being in the order of an estimated 13 to 30m in diameter. Direct hits of asteroids that size are believed to not always make it to earth but instead explode in the atmosphere. If they do, the damage (if any) is localized. You can view more details (including a java applet orbit simulation which shows the asteroid path) via NASA's close approaches page. 911 - three years on
Saturday 11 September, 2004 at 8:48AM (Nereus) :: permalink :: comments (0) :: trackbacks (1)
photography illegal?
Wednesday 8 September, 2004 at 1:29PM (Nereus) :: permalink :: comments (2) I was doing a bit of a cleanup of the photos section of this site (it's been pretty much untouched since I last redesigned Urban Scrawl) and I was considering starting a separate photoblog. After reading a number of other weblogs earlier this morning, I don't think I'll be able to go ahead because it would seem that taking photographs in NYC (or anywhere in the US for that matter) can land you with accusations of being a terrorist, unless you're "a member of the press holding a valid press identification card issued by the New York City Police Department or by others duly authorized in writing to engage in such activity by the authority". No, I'm not kidding. The possible penalty if innocent? Up to 10 days in jail and US$125 fine in the case of taking a photo in the NYC subway system. Nice one. Note that authorities were enforcing this law even though it had apparently not been legally passed as law at the time (I'm unsure if it has been passed as law even now). I guess that's where the Patriot Act abuse comes in, it seems authorities can just make it up as they go. I can understand the need for police to question the motives of people taking photos of possible terrorist targets, but lets be a little realistic here, New York attracts tourists, and tourists take photographs, it's as simple as that. Similarly, I'd like to take photos around NYC so friends and family back home in New Zealand (or anyone else who's interested) can come to this website and see what we've been up to. It seems that I won't be able to do that. I thought that kind of crap went out with Communist Russia. A weblogger named Etan was taking photos around his campus in New Jersey the other day when he was stopped by police and told that taking photos was illegal, and the officer went on to call him a terrorist (read the full story here on his weblog). Considering I'm starting my first day of class ever in an American educational institution tomorrow, I was thinking of taking some photos around campus as well. Guess not, I don't want to spend my first day of class being detained by the police, thank you very much. Of course there's been a fair bit of discussion about this. My own thoughts in Etans case is that the officer was fully within his rights and doing his job to question him, and I don't have a problem with that (in fact in that sense I think the Patriot Act is ok in that it allows the officer to question him - there's no harm in that, and I would even consider it as being proactive). Calling Etan a terrorist and telling him it's illegal to take photographs is just bullshit however. Usually I'd say, "Don't blame the street cops, they're just following orders", but in this case the officer went too far. I'd be highly offended if someone accused me of being a terrorist and I'd damn well let them know it. What is really bad is that if Etan told them where to go and got arrested for it, that would go down on his permanent record and affect things such as future employment, despite Etan being completely innocent, and that's just totally unjust. Another commenter named 'Otter' said something which was very true though: ..and what is amazing to me is that I can read over what I write, and read Etan's post, and realize that three years ago today all of this would have sounded literally impossible to me. I'd sound like a conspiracy theorist. Etan would sound like a nutball. The police would sound like representatives of a government which is given powers and liberties which would not exist in the America I knew at the time.. Another example of the excesses and unfairness being exercised in enforcing the laws against these 'illegal activities' is well illustrated in this account titled "Humiliated, Angry, Ashamed, Brown." by photography student Ian Spiers. The photo essay is several pages worth and a very interesting read, the irony being that while Ian was harassed for wielding a camera by local security police and federal agents, camera-wielding tourists were passing by all around them unimpeded. I hope Ian gets an A+ for that assignment, he deserves it. The moral in both these cases (if you can call it a moral) is to cooperate fully and do whatever the police say, regardless of your actual rights. That is not a good moral in a country based on freedom and democracy. Of course there is a lot of people putting the blame squarely on Bush's shoulders. One thing to remember is that Bush did not start this, a group of terrorists started it almost three years ago by flying jets into the World Trade Towers. Had it been Kerry in power and had he done nothing (which seems to be likely), Kerry would've been torn apart by the public for it, and people would've been screaming to remove Kerry and replace him with Bush, however it just so happens that Bush was in the drivers seat when it went down. A comment by 'deadscot' on John P Hoke's Asylum addressed the following analogy to me in regards to wanting President Bush out: Have you ever seen one of the prison buses with the cage that divides the poisoners from the guards and driver? Let's say you're sitting in the back of that bus and the driver is heading straight for a cliff. Do you want to stick with him because he knows how to drive, or do you want one of the guards to push him out of the way and take over the bus? My response to this was to add an additional circumstance to the same analogy: Let's say you're sitting in the back of that bus and the driver is heading straight for a cliff because some terrorist is holding a gun to his head. Do you want the guard to overpower the driver because he just happened to be the in that seat when the terrorist put the gun to his head, or do you want the guard to try to push the terrorist out of the way and let the driver do his job? I don't like what's happening in the US, but at the same time I realize that as much as I dislike it, it is a consequence of the actions of terrorists. If you want to blame someone, ultimately you should blame them. new zealand - god's own
Tuesday 7 September, 2004 at 11:57PM (Nereus) :: permalink :: comments (0) Once upon a time in the Kingdom of Heaven, God went missing for six days. Eventually Michael the archangel found him on the seventh day, resting. He inquired of God, "Where have you been?" |
current weblog entries weblog archives syndication (atom/rss) weather forecasts related utilities online games psychic mind reader the bad day cure internet security webmaster resources password generator gisborne surf, nz goat island bay session las vegas 2005 bbc world headlines cnn world headlines michelle malkin usgs earthquakes daily rotten news national geographic time world headlines time photoessays urban scrawl site info urban scrawl site map contact the author linkage list |
|
| |